Kia ora!
I’m interested in all kinds of cool things. If you think I can help you, send me a message! No harm in asking 🙂.
I have skills of various capabilities accross a wide variety of things. I’m generally happy to provide some basic consultation of how to solve problems for free for anyone doing interesting work with good intentions and if I’ve got the time (and you’ve got the cause) I might be able to offer more.
Need someone who can problem-solve on their feet and support your event? Let me know. I’ve even build custom software for events. Want live photo screens for instagram posts of your event? I’ve done it before!
I know heaps of cool people.
Probably my greatest skill is getting to know great people doing great things. If you’ve got an interest in anything from origami to unionism, I probably know someone you should talk to!
NZQA recognised my efforts in Art Photography with an NZQA scholarship for university.
“Scholarship candidates are expected to demonstrate high-level critical thinking, abstraction and generalisation, and to integrate, synthesise and apply knowledge, skills, understanding, and ideas to complex situations.” — NZQA
Recipient of University of Auckland Summer Scholarship.
Recipient of University of Auckland PhD Scholarship.
My grades at university largely reflect my interests. I’m sharing the courses I achieved distinguishing grades in, as well as the assignmnets that got me there. I hope opening access to these works may help someone in future when considering the direction of their work, or simply on the merit of their content.
I achieved the highest grades of my cohort in:
I have achieved distinctive grades in the following classes:
Year | Subject | Class | Grade | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019/1 | Arts Scholars | 100 | A | Arts Scholars 1 |
2019/1 | Computer Science | 101 | A+ | Principles of Programming |
2019/1 | Sociology | 105 | A | Cultural Studies and Society |
2019/2 | Communication | 204 | A | Social Media |
2020/1 | Arts Scholars | 200 | A | Arts Scholars 2 |
2020/1 | Communication | 302 | A | Visual Communication |
2020/1 | Sociology | 200 | A- | Sociological Theory |
2020/1 | Sociology | 206 | A+ | Sociology for Auckland |
2020/2 | Communication | 300 | A+ | New Media and the Future of Communication |
2020/2 | Communication | 301 | A+ | Digital Communication and Practise |
2020/2 | Sociology | 208 | A- | Economy and Society |
2021/1 | Economics | 151 | A+ | Understanding the Global Economy |
2021/1 | Arts Scholars | 300 | A | Arts Scholars 3 |
2021/1 | Sociology | 310 | A | Researching Social Problems |
2021/1 | Sociology | 326 | A+ | Sociology of Violence |
2021/2 | Education | 100 | A+ | The Creative Process |
2021/2 | Sociology | 203 | A+ | Social Reality and Ideology |
2021/2 | Sociology | 333 | A | Sociology of Health, Illness, and Medicine |
2022/1 | Sociology | 718 | A+ | Research Projects: Design and Practice |
2022/1 | Sociology | 706 | A+ | The Sociology of Disasters |
2022/2 | Sociology | 790 | A+ | Research Project |
I am particularly proud of a number of my assignments.
As a submission for Comms 301, I created Facelist, a Facebook satire that you can access here.
Tip: try clocking in with “Harry” or “Frodo”.
Mark: 10/10
“Amazing work. This is really biting in its critique, and your reflection as you walk through your project is really insightful. The amount of detail you have taken in altering Facebook is incredible.” -Tutor
“Ahhhhh facelist is amazing!!” -Lecurer
For Sociol 326 I designed ‘Got what it takes’, a violence prevention programme targeting bullying behaviours in New Zealand high schools. The assignment was grounded in role strain theory, included methods for evaluating the programme and acknowledged potential implementation limitations.
Mark: 39/40
“One word: Sophistication If you explicitly talked about the interconnection between the Role Strain and HM, it would be even better.” –Tutor.
This essay looks into the shifting role of labour and capital in labour relations under the uber production model. The obligations of labourers are increasing while their job stability, incomes and rights are all shrinking. Additionally, labourers are now expected to front capital to sell their labour while receiving none of the traditional capitalist rewards.
Mark: 25/25
“This is a well researched and well written piece of work. While you present a wide array of technologies and businesses as examples, you manage to package them in a clearly structured and coherent essay that works to analyze technological progress through an economic determinist view. You demonstrate a wealth of knowledge and understanding when it comes to the processes of labor and the impacts caused by the systems that facilitate these processes. Also how technology and the ‘Uber’ model could be playing into those ideas under capitalism and the exploitation of automation. I am deeply impressed and highly commend you on your work and efforts with this assignment. Well done!” -Tutor
This essay uses Spatial Assimilation and Place Stratification theories to model the effects of race and ethnicity. Precisely how these factors affect actualising socio-economic status into actual attainment for the minority Māori population in the Auckland region. The arguments are supported along the way by quantitative data collected from NZ.Stat.
Mark: 20/20
“Well done Java on an insightful paper. This is the type of data analysis that is important to begin conversations on discrimination and racism. Congratulations on an outstanding paper.” -Lecturer
Mark: 30/30
“Thank you for sharing your experiences with me Java. As always, you have written a wonderfully critical paper. Your ability to weave not only the personal with theory but also Auckland city with broader national concerns is to be commended. I have enjoyed getting to know you this semester through your writing, and I look forward to having you in my classes again in the future.” -Lecturer
Mark: 19/20
“Well done Java on an intellectually stimulating analysis of Ihumātao. I look forward to reading more of your work.” -Lecturer
Mark: 28.2/30
“Good use of examples, excellent work, moves a bit fast at points and could benefit from slower more methodical explanation, but otherwise a very strong essay. Well done!” -Tutor
Mark: 18.5/20
“Java, excellent job. All 3 of us (Tutor1, Tutor2 and me) read your essay. Tutor2 described it as “beautiful” and although we assume you put a good deal of work into it, they said it read as if it was written effortlessly. Our only critique is you cut back on digging into one theoretical perspective. Your application of the theories are great, but a bit more describing selected theories would have helped. You do a good job with hegemonic masculinity. With coercive control, you introduce and bring out a detailed aspect of Starks’ perspective with safety zones. But you don’t define it thoroughly and you had some word count space to do so. Still, your application of CC and HM is great. Good job also bringing in Foucault. Overall, a very sophisticated analysis.” –Lecturer
Mark: 37/40
No feedback was given for final assignments.
Mark: 25/25
“Kia Ora Java, I enjoyed reading your assignment as it eloquently offers a refined data gathering instrument and literature review. Your literature is insightful and offers nuance to your research question. Great incorporation of graphs. Well done!” –Tutor
Mark: 36/40
No feedback given for final assignments.
This was my first university essay!
Mark: 17/20
“Kia ora Java, This was an interesting and well articulated essay, which followed a clear narrative progression, however this could have been outlined more clearly in the introduction. Discussion of the conservative scholars covered some important aspects of their work, and engaged well with critiques. This is contrasted well with that of Williams, however the discussion included the perspective of so many scholars that the essay could not address these in detail. Nonetheless, as the different definition are discussed, the implications are acknowledged for most of these. Narrowing the scope of the essay to allow for more detailed analysis would have allowed for a higher mark, but nonetheless this was great work.” –Tutor
Mark: 27/30
“Kia ora Java, This was an engaging project essay, with the cultural text and essay question chosen aligning well. The discussion of the text is contextualised well within debates around copyright law, acknowledging the differing perspectives on this. While this is important contextual information, a lot of the essay was dedicated to exploring this issue, meaning that there was less opportunity for focus on the analysis of the cultural text at hand, or the work of Jenkins as the subject of the essay question. Nonetheless, when these subjects are explored in the essay they are done so well, demonstrating a good understanding of the appropriate theory. Overall, this was an excellent essay.” –Tutor
Mark: 10/10
“Excellent work. Your reflection is really insightful and shows some keen consideration. Your Flappy Bird GIF is particularly charming.” –Tutor
Mark: 15/15
“This is SO GOOD. The Tracery grammar developing the text, as you note, could be improved, expanded, developed in different directions, but even in this kind of raw dadaist version, the mashup is great! Would be curious to hear about that bug and why you chose url.me instead of memegen? Holler!” –Lecturer
Mark: 25/25
“Kia ora Java, This is a very well-written and insightful review that delves into the complexities of your text while also addressing the ways in which an audience can absorb this information. I particularly enjoyed the way in which you infused your own background in sociology to articulate how the documentary comments on the economic impacts of automation. You’ve also interestingly pointed out the documentary’s shortcomings in how it frames its subject through the consequences of misusing technology to hard company profits, while rightly pointing out concern for those same companies to suffer no backlash under the pretense of creating jobs. I found this to be a very thought-provoking piece that explored the various facets of technological determinism and the ways in which it can lead to an increase in unemployment with the rise of automation. Well done!” –Tutor
Mark: 17/20
“Java, Your essay shows a good understanding of the essay question and Holt’s discussion on cultural resource versus cultural blueprint. The approach you have taken in focusing L&P as a brand is a great strength to your essay and indicates a great-level of engagement with course content. The main point of feedback I have for you is your application of concepts. While you have identified and included a number of key terms, they are needing some further unpacking in order to consider their significance and the effect upon the ad itself in taking this approach. By doing this you will be able to strengthen your argument as a whole and allow for a smoother flow of ideas. This essay is a great start and clearly shows your strong understanding of the content and ability to successfully undergo independent research. Nice work! If you have any questions or if any of my feedback needs clarifying please don’t hesitate to let me know.” –Tutor
Mark: 18.34/20 pts
Mark: 22.04/29
“Hi Java, You’ve picked an important topic to study, and were quite thorough in your description and analysis of the Tik Tok videos. As well, you do a good job of articulating why the information discrepancies matter. One area that could have been stronger is the introduction. While you do a good job of introducing TikTok and why its coverage matters, it would have been helpful to articulate your rationale for choosing ADHD. Also, you should always end your introduction with a roadmap, which describes what you will be covering in your paper. Regarding the content, while your discussion of the videos was thorough, I would have liked to see a discussion about the sources of the problems. Nevertheless, this was a fine effort overall, and I hope analysing the TikTok content has helped you see the discrepancies that exist between the medical literature and the media portrayals of disease. take good care of yourself and I wish you the best of luck with all your future endeavours, Lecturer :).” –Lecturer
Mark: 28.5/30
“This is a good piece; cogent and the sections are well balanced. The show and/or its philosophy is kept central to the analysis, and acts as a thread that links content. The “debunking” aspect of this is compelling. The correspondence between distinction and ideology is clearer toward the end, a little less clear up front.” –Lecturer
Mark: 19.25/20
“This is well-written and shows a good understanding of the concepts. Good to see someone grapple with Luhmann and do it well. The analytic paragraph does something novel, which is also good to see.” –Lecturer
Mark: 20/20
“Kia ora, Java. What an awesome project! Both your documentation and essay are sound and unique. You demonstrate an excellent understanding of course content; your arguments are strong and well-developed. Brilliant work, really. It is always a pleasure to read such insightful writing. (Random comment: I was surprised to see 3 of the YouTube channels I subscribe to on page 12 + Chomsky!)” –Tutor
Mark: 19/20
Mark: 28/30
Mark: 15/20
“This great literature review spanned several key texts and ideas that will make critiquing and engaging an exciting and straightforward project in the next semester. However, I think the shift in the topic may have disadvantaged you in terms of time. This could have been a fantastic literature review with more time, as I have seen your previous work. The main thing missing in this is how each idea is essential to your overall question. So in each idea/term paragraph, you needed to include: Understanding academic capitalism allows us to track how capital influences the academy; this is particularly important in a New Zealand context where universities source revenues from government, commercial operations, students and charity. Otherwise, you essentially have a dictionary. You also needed to have the context and neoliberal shifts in NZ universities at the front; this would have made it easier to understand why these key concepts are appropriate to New Zealand.” –Lecturer
Mark: 38/40
“Fantastic work Java that reflects your capability. Great literature review that was much more cohesive and wove things together. There were moments the relation to the overall question could have been clearer. Perhaps we can discuss some techniques for this over the semester. Your writing is improving and once you nail the clear communication piece we can start to weave your voice into the work again - the joy of PG is making, unmaking and remaking our writing so that it walks that fine balance between clearly communicated and reflective of the author. You have some brilliant one-liners in here that you build to with evidence and examples, well done. You have carefully through your proposal and as a result, have a really solid proposal here.” –Lecturer
I have presented students’ interests to the university on multiple occasions, in various formats, including through the creation of feedback sessions between students and faculty.
I successfully ran a campaign to garnish student awareness and engage with faculty regarding funding cuts to the Social Sciences, despite an increase in enrollments. I handed off this social momentum to the Arts Students Organisation at the university.
Involvement in the organisation, participation and management of various forms of student consultation at The University of Auckland, working with AUSA, the Arts faculty, and the Arts Scholars programme.
Issues covered include communication mechanisms, university–student relations, and the responsibilities of the university in creating a safe and effective educational space for all students.
I’ve represented many classes for student-lecturer engagement, staff-student consultations and student-university communications.
I have also represented the department of Social Sciences in the Arts Faculty consultation meetings twice and the Arts Scholars module once.